Nearly 300,000 jobs were cut in Q1 of 2026 alone, and more than half were labeled “AI-driven.” But a closer look at the data tells a very different story than the one most professionals are hearing. A client of mine, a senior operations director with 18 years of experience, was let go in February. The[…]
If your resume is written only for a human reader, it’s already out of sync with how hiring actually works. Most hiring processes no longer begin with a recruiter reading your experience line by line. They begin with interpretation. AI-assisted applicant tracking systems parse language, map experience to job requirements, and rank candidates based on[…]
AI didn’t make job searching easier. It made average candidates look identical, and standout candidates harder to spot. That’s a radical statement in a marketplace that popularized access. The narrative is that AI gives every job seeker high‑quality writing and friction‑free entry to opportunity. The reality is that a flood of algorithm-ready resumes is changing[…]
The frustration people feel about AI in hiring isn’t really about technology itself. What seems to be emerging with the advent of AI/automation is the loss of traditional hiring dynamics. It may show up in a variety of ways: So many of the explanations I’m seeing blame machines: algorithms, screening tools, automated rejections. That story[…]
Let’s start with the truth most people are just now catching up to: your resume probably isn’t being read by a human first anymore. Before a recruiter ever lays eyes on your name, an algorithm has already made a decision about whether you’re worth seeing. It has scanned your experience. It has compared your language[…]